The reason why the Constitutional Tribunal commented again on the acquisitive prescription of the transmission easement was that the PoznańNowe Miasto and Wilda District Court in Poznań submitted three questions of law. TK ruled that the proceedings be discount by refusing an answer to a question from the District Court. A glosator fully supported the conclusion in the tenor of the ruling of the TK. Nevertheless he expressed his view that the ruling commented on is vitiated by relative invalidity caused by the defect of the staff in the adjudicating panel, which included persons who were not the judges of the TK.